JH SEO Agency
Names 4 answer engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity.
Read 12 September 2026 · jhseoagency.com/geo-hvac/
The scores
| Criterion | Score | Weighted of its weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named engine coverage | 4 / 5 | 20 / 25 | |
| Measurement method shown | 2 / 5 | 8 / 20 | |
| Citation change over time | 0 / 5 | 0 / 10 | |
| Entity and schema competence | 3 / 5 | 18 / 30 | |
| Falsifiability | 0 / 5 | 0 / 15 |
What the page actually says
- Engines
- Four named engines.
- Method
- Says it tracks citation frequency through to click-through rates. No prompt set, cadence or artefact.
- Change over time
- Nothing published.
- Entity and schema
- Structured data, semantic cues, explicit citations, AI-friendly formatting and llms.txt. No specific schema types named.
- Falsifiability
- None, and the page leads with three unsourced figures.
What we would ask them about
2 things on JH SEO Agency's own page, worth raising before you sign. Not a judgement about the work.
- AskUnsourced: “+126% more average growth for companies” and “+14.6% close rate from organic leads.”
- AskUnsourced: “more than 71% of online users turn to AI tools to find local services.”
The check we would run on this one
JH SEO Agency names its engines and stops short of saying how it measures them. Open jhseoagency.com/geo-hvac/ and look for a prompt count, a run cadence, or any reporting artefact you could be shown. If none appears, the gap is disclosure rather than capability, and it closes the moment they write those three things down. Ask for them before signing rather than after.
Disagree with any of this? The corrections log is where it gets settled, in public, with a date.